Posts Tagged ‘ books ’

My review of Tom King’s A Once Crowded Sky

Since the introduction of Superman in 1938, superhero comic books have undergone a slow maturation from cartoonish to naturalistic. Despite the fantastic central idea of a superhero, for the last twenty-five years, a realistic approach to storytelling has finally brought the art form legitimacy.

Recently superhero novels set in their own universes have begun to proliferate. Most of them are dark superhero noir, cultivating realism,   like the modern comic books they are based on.

Following tonally in the footsteps of Those who Walk in Darkness, and thematically in the footsteps of Soon I Will Be Invincible, Tom King’s A Once Crowded Sky tells the final story in an age of super heroes.

The characters are drawn from common comic book tropes. Soldier is wolverine crossed with captain America, a cryogenically preserved grandson   of George Washington. PenUltimate is Robin to Superman instead of Batman, Strength is something like Wonder Woman with issues, Doctor Speed is the Flash with a medical practice.

The books secondary characters are a combination of familiar characters with the serial numbers rubbed off and original creations.

The first thing you should know about a Once Crowded sky is that its good. The style is more literary than the comic book illustrations at the beginning of each chapter indicate. The second thing you should know is that the novel is depressing. Its the comic book novel equivalent of All Quiet on the Western front.

The plot. An energy force known as the Blue threatens to destroy the universe. The Ultimate, (a robotic superman,) understands the only way to stop it. All super heroes must sacrifice their powers and this combined energy will seal the rift through which the energy is pouring into our world.

All make the sacrifice accept one, PenUltimate, robin, who has decided being a superhero is too much sacrifice and is retired.  Then the book begins.

If your sold, the novels good,  stop here. Miner spoilers follow.

Calling a once crowded sky a superhero novel is not completely accurate. Because when the book opens there is only one superpowered individual left in the world.

The others have all been depowered. So its more accurate to call a Once Crowded Sky a post superhero novel.

How depowered individuals deal with the loss of so much power is one of the  novels major themes. The answer, for the most part is they deal very badly.

The absurd nature of comic books is lampshaded on almost every page. Former superheroes talk to one another about villains they defeated, and how the villains come back again and again. They call their conflicts the game, a game they all loved to play. And now its gone.

for All but PenUltimate, who got sick of being a superhero and quit, so when everyone    agreed to sacrifice their abilities, he wasn’t there and is thus left the worlds last superhero.

He begins the novel using his powers only to continuously save the depowered Wonder Woman, who despite now being only human keeps trying to fight  three or four armed thugs at a time.

But when an unknown force begins attacking the city, PenUltimate teams up with Soldier, Captain America/Wolverine/the Punisher, to figure out who is responsible and starts trying to be a superhero again.

A Once Crowded Sky toys with your expectations. Given that it is a novel about superheroes with only one superhero in it this was bound to happen. The types of city spanning battles where people punch their enemies through buildings are mostly absent,  happening primarily in flashback.

Through the snappy comic book dialogue,  King evokes a pitch perfect shared history for his characters. We don’t get to see a lot of it because we’re coming in at the end, but that makes the bits of backstory we do get more interesting.

Soldier, the Captain America stand inn, runs into all the normal people who used to be superheroes. Most of them talk over old times, trade stories of playing the game.

The novel at its best looks at the idea of saving the world every day and what that would do to people. Some are happy to be human again, others are devastated. Doctor Speed, the Flash, drinks now that he is no longer spending  his time saving civilians.

All the major comic book tropes  are examined, from characters being killed off and later coming back to supervillains always escaping from jail, to the question present in every comic book, who wants to dress up in a costume and save the world?

King handles his ex-superheroes with a surprisingly deft touch for a first novelist. If handled poorly the genre conventions of superhero stories can make a superhero novel into shit far more easily than can the same elements in a comic book. But MR. King handles the idea of masked men in tights flying around well.  He draws his characters in such a way that going from superhero to ordinary person is made relatable.

The flashbacks that are found often throughout the novel provide just enough superheroics that a reader will not feel slighted by there lack. The contrast these flashbacks raise between who these people used to be and who they are now is one of the novels major strengths.

Many of the former heroes are shown in an unfavorable light, unable to cope without their game. This is not a heavy handed rebuke, its an outgrowth of the plot.

The plot of the novel isn’t why you should read it. Naturally its ripped straight from a comic book. A dark comic book. Its well done, but A Once Crowded sky is more a meditation on power,  the obligations of having it, the consequences of losing it, and what people will do to get it back.

Although the superheroes are realistic, the world they live in is in all ways  the world of comic books. King knows the laws of such a world  and created the world of the novel to follow them with a fanboys fidelity. this constant contradiction between the world of stories the superheroes inhabit and the humanity  of the same heroes is one of the novels biggest strengths.

As A Once Crowded Sky continues, the facts of comic book life intrude further into the characters thoughts and actions, and the general absurdity inherent in living in such a world becomes apparent.

But it is not apparent to most of the superheroes. They wander around like ghosts now that they cannot play the game, and when a slim chance arises which might allow them to regain their abilities, they jump at it without looking back.

It is  only soldier, who has served in every war since the first world war with twenty years of superheroism after desert storm who begins to question the meaning of all the superhero lifestyle. What’s the point of beating a bad guy when he’s going to come back in three months?

At no point does a once crowded sky disappoint. It  does  become overly meta towards the end when King is making his final points about comic books, but never so meta  that the story is ruined.

If you are looking for a straight up homage to superhero comics, look elsewhere. But if your in the mood for something kind of bleak, and you would  like to read a well written and engaging deconstruction of that Genre, pick up a Once Crowded Sky.

My taste in literature is wide ranging. If you enjoyed this book review, follow the blog.

Not worth the Hype, my review of Hyperion by Dan Simmons.

Dan Simmons is an author I wish I liked. He presents interesting concepts, creates characters that should be three dimensional, tells long well thought out stories, and all that happens when I read them is that I wish I liked them more than I end up liking them. 

Hyperion is no exception. Modeled after the Canterbury tails, only with a more extensive framing story, Hyperion takes place in a far future. People have faster than life travel, artificial inteligence has been created and succeeded from humanities control, humanity has colonized hundreds of worlds… 

Against this backdrop exists the world of Hyperion. On this world lives a being called the Shrike. 

Somehow, when groups of people make a “shrike pilgrimage,” the shrike kills everyone in the group but one. The survivor gets anything he or she wants, one request. 

The main human empire is at war with a tribe of space barbarians. Against this backdrop the story begins. 

A detective, a poet, a scholar, a ship captain, a diplomat, a soldier and a priest are the seven chosen for the last pilgrimage. As they each tell there story, the reader realizes that each is somehow connected to the shrike. 

If you’ve read any Dan Simmons before and liked him stop reading this review right now and go read Hyperion. If not, read on. 

Simmons has written a book which I really wish I appreciated more. I can’t find anything wrong with it but it took me weeks and weeks to get through. If I like a book I read it in days. 

I was never uninterested, but I was never truly interested either. Each story, there are seven plus the framing tail, works well. 

They are told in the first person and while Simmons characters sound awfully alike his first person voice is confident and polished. So individually I liked the tails and if Hyperion had been published without the framing device, which admittedly is a third of the book, I would have probably liked it more although it would have made much less sense. 

But the framing sections, narrated in third person limited omniscient drag hard. Bla bla bla. 

They are important as far as the plot is concerned, but I just never got into them. 

The only problem I found with the book was that there wasn’t enough exposition. Its strange because I hardly got through the book, but I think it should have been longer. A key concept of the novel is that the shrike will kill everyone in a group but one to whom it will grant a wish. But no character ever comes out and says this, it has to be gleaned. I got it on its first mention, of course, but even so, I feel many things like this should have been explained more thoroughly as they are major plot points. 

In conclusion, Hyperion is not a bad book. It just wasn’t to my taste, but I can’t say others won’t like it. 

Can’t rate this one, because I feel I’m in a small minority without being able to explain why, but my personal rating is like two stars. 

I’m Back and the nytimes Book Review

So I haven’t blogged in a while. I guess that’s why its been raining so much lately, god was crying. Sorry about the hiatus but I’m back now so the sun shall soon shine. Anyway…

   

is good, thoughtful books about interesting historical events or current political issues, but finding interesting novels in the times book review is like finding needles in haystacks. selection there nonfiction. Who the hell gets there book recommendations from the New-York times book review section? I mean, I admit about two-thirds of have a questionI

  

The times just throws out these books that no one wants to read. From pompous author so and so, or from foreign author so and so, this book, about absolutely nothing, has sixteen creative metaphors , a nonlinear plot structure, characters who are more symbol than reality and a wonderful scene where the narrator drinks while looking out to sea. We love it.  

And I have middlebrow tastes. I hate James Patterson, and authors like him, but the times seems to purposefully review fiction that only ass holes want to read.  

my reviews of March Upcountry and March to the Sea, by David Weber and John Ringo.

March upcountry and march to the Sea 

I rarely read novels with more than one author. I think collaborating is cheating a little bit, and I always wonder why the hell authors are so lazy that they need to write a novel with someone else. It strikes me as odiously commercial, if you have two authors working on a novel, you can write it for half the work and in half the time and the publisher can make a couple bucks even if the novel sucks. 

Nonetheless, having nothing else to read, I read the two books March Upcountry and March to the Sea by both John Ringo and David Weber. If two authors work on a book, I figure its ok to review the first two books in the series at the same time. 

The series, which has four books to date is an homage to the Edgar Rice Burros style of adventure novels. A spoiled prince, on his way to perform routine diplomatic service crash lands on a planet full of primitive aliens. Luckily, he’s not alone. His royal bodyguard, consisting of somewhere between fifty and seventy marines, is with him. There’s a spaceport across the planet from where the crash landing occurred, and the marines are trying to get the prince to the port so that they can try and steal a ship and get back to Earth. 

I’m divided as hell about these books. They suffer from a lot of problems, and work more as novels of idea’s then they do as fast paced adventure novels, which is ironic, because they are supposed to be fast paced adventure novels, but rapid pacing is the exact opisit of what they actually are. 

These novels drag with a capital D. 

The main plot device, repeated over and over again is that, while trying to get to this spaceport, the marines and the prince influence the primitive alien societies around them. Sometimes they overthrow governments, sometimes they trade technology for safe passage, and all of this is explained in thorough detail. 

A battle that lasts a day in the world of the book can drag on for a hundred pages, and instead of being described in snapshots of blood and gore, its more commonly shown by long conversations of the commanding officers. The series is really more of a hypothetical argument than a novel. “If futuristic marines were dropped on a primitive planet, what would happen.” 

And that question is answered exhaustively. Each society encountered is altered in some way, and discussions of the alterations and the implications, ethical, economic and political, are also discussed at length. 

The other problem is that characters are never really developed well. They aren’t exactly one dimensional, but the character development that does happen is not exactly subtle. The spoiled prince is gossiped about by other characters, with several theories tossed around for why he is why he is, which doesn’t matter for long because he doesn’t stay a spoiled prince for long. This is the type of book where people get better under stress, not worse. So soon the prince is self sacrificing and friendly, a war leader. Now, this isn’t the main problem, because while its not subtle, its not ham handed enough to be too awkward or unbelievable. The real problem is the marines. There are between seventy or fifty or something, an din the first book all of them it seems have several pages of narration which doesn’t matter because most are interchangeable. 

primitive aliens pop up like breeding rabbits, and also get there own viewpoint chapters. One alien tribal leader is much like another, just like most of the marines are interchangeable, so while the perspective is valuable, the actual character background really isn’t. 

Out of the maybe fifteen main characters of each book, three or four are unique enough to be interesting, the others only serve to fill out the exposition. 

I’m the type of guy who is moderately interested in this type of thing, and I finished these two books in about a week. They don’t grab your attention, but they can keep it, because despite the slow pacing, the idea’s the book examines are solidly dealt with, and as I say, are dealt with thoroughly. 

So whether you want to read these books really depends on why you want to pick up a novel. If you want a great story, don’t bother. The plot is an obvious set up to examine idea’s, and is mostly predictable. Example. Does the prince get with the cute female marine? Yes, obviously. If you want truly compelling characters, don’t bother. The characters with the most screen time are developed adequately, but the others are card bored cutouts of the worst kind. But if you want to read a novel that concerns itself with ideas, and not literary ideas but practical ideas, or really, not practical idea’s taken seriously, then read this. discussion of military tactics abound and the solutions to problems are dealt with realistically, even though the situation is obviously fantastic. If your into military history, or emerging technology, or kind of overblown adventure novels, give this series a try. If not, definitely don’t. 

  

The main strength of this series is how it goes about showing the practical problems of most adventure novels. The main theme is that humanity as a species kicks ass, because we have the technology and morality to uplift lesser species, which I suppose could be read as an allegory for America verses the third world, but I didn’t bother to take the books that seriously. 

can’t give this one a rating, its too subjective. 

A Boring Gospel. Ho-hum.

I read books which I don’t actually have much desire to read, but I finish them anyway. Call it a testament to useless productivity. Is there such a thing as useless productivity, or is that an oxymoron.
Anyway, the Gospel according to Larry by Janet Tashjian was one of those books. The books about this kid named josh who starts a blog ranting about consumerism. A lot of people start to follow the blog, to the point where Josh is a huge celebrity. Then someone finds out Larry is Josh, and Josh’s life is turned upside down, and I did not care.
Josh is one of those post modern hippy types. He hates big companies because he feels they have an undue influence on the culture. He hates celebrities, hates everything normal America reveres.
Josh’s coming out shatters his life, but not his ideals. Because Josh is already a fully formed character, and because everyone knowing he writes this blog stresses him out but never changes him, the book was merely passable, as apposed to truly enthralling. Josh doesn’t change very much if at all during the course of the book, so I didn’t much care about him as a character. Given that the book is written in first person, and is all about Josh, there isn’t anything else to care about. This was a review I wrote only because I read the book.

Author’s web site. http://www.janettashjian.com/
1 and a half out of five stars.

an average ride, a review of Jennifer Bradburys Shift.

I always feel a little bad whenever I review a book which I can’t find serious flaws with but which overall I still didn’t really like. Only because the author hasn’t done anything wrong, but I have to tell people that I’m not recommending the book anyway.
Jennifer Bradbury, however, has won a couple awards and has been nominated for a couple more, so the disdain of a third rate blogger shouldn’t rile her too much and that soothes my guilt.
As I said above, Shift doesn’t do anything wrong. Bradbury writes well, characters act in believable ways, although they are painted in broad strokes. The plot is paced well, making the reader turn the pages to find out what happens.
The plot is simple enough. Chris and Win go on a cross country bike trip. Chris comes back, Win doesn’t, and there it is. Win’s father and the FBI pressure Chris to tell them where Win’s gotten off to, and Chris finally decides that he’d like the answer to that question himself. Is win dead, captured by cultists, just on the lamb?
The author does give the reader an answer, and it is satisfying and unambiguous, and that gives the novel points in my book. I think what I object too about the novel is that the scenes that take place after the bike trip feel rushed and the ending comes too soon.
I don’t men to imply that this is one of those books where I wish the ending would never come, because it isn’t, but only that, because it was rushed, it lost something. I think the novel would have been better served with an additional thirty or forty pages, because the suspense could have built further before the final climax. And as for a denouement, well, there really isn’t one. Shift is good enough for what it is. I was engaged enough to care a bit about what happened and to finish it, but I’m not going to try and get everyone I know to read it.
My final recommendation is this. Want a fairly obvious mystery novel, read Shift. Want to kill a couple hours? read shift. A fan of novels about road trips? Read shift. Want a great novel you’ll never forget? Go read Crime and Punishment, war and Peace, but not Shift.

two and a half stars.

Author’s web site. http://www.jennifer-bradbury.com/

Pay it Forward with a deck of cards, a review of Markus Zusak’s I am the Messenger

I am the messenger, by Markus Zusak
When Ed Kennedy happens to be in a bank while its held up, due to the sheer incompetents of the robber he’s able to capture him until the cops arrive. He’s written about in the local papers,, interviewed on the radio, and then his life goes back to normal, which basically means he spends his days driving a taxicab and his nights playing cards with his friends, who are almost as shiftless as he is.
Then he gets an Ace of diamonds in the mail, with three addresses on it. When he goes to the addresses, he realizes that whoever sent him the card wants him to help the people at each address. A lonely old lady, a teenager with no self-esteem, and a woman who gets raped every night by her husband.
I wasn’t wild about this novel. Its well written, with realistic characters, and the voice of the narrator is believable and funny in a righ, world weary sort of way.
The plot starts out interesting, but as more cards arrive in Ed’s mailbox, along with more people to help, the book slows down. After the fifth or sixth person is introduced who Ed is supposed to help in some small way, it begins to feel like Zusak is telling the same story over and over again.
I was never outright bored by the book, but the plot is always dictated by the card Ed gets, and the omniscient person who keeps sending them.
I was starting to think that maybe USA would never tell the reader who sent the cards and why they sent them, but luckily this isn’t the case. Everything’s revealed at the end, although this revelation provides more questions, and not enough answers.
The book is worth reading for character and action, but if you want definitive answers to all the questions the book poses, you definitely won’t get them.
The book suffers from a plot that is riddled with coincidence and serendipity. At first this isn’t a problem, but later on it becomes grading. The book picks up slightly towards the end, when Ed is directed to help his group of friends and his mother, but the sense that everything he does is inevitable never goes away. The book’s message of hope is sweet, the narrator is funny, but the plot drags it down to something only above average. Still worth a read, if you’re in it for atmosphere and Idea’s, however.
Author’s web site. http://www.randomhouse.com/features/markuszusak/
three out of five stars.

Polaski on Polaski. Either Gay sex with my twin, or an interview with myself.

I was lucky enough to get the chance to sit down with Jason Polaski for an interview. He usually doesn’t give interviews, but it helps that we’re the same person. I have indulged in the ultimate act of arrogance. I have interviewed myself, and the really sick thing is that I actually enjoyed it a lot, I babbled on to myself for quite a while. The interview’s below. Jason asks the questions, Polaski answers them.

Jason. So, how bout you introduce yourself.
Polaski. This is stupid as shit. Its a gimmick.

Jason. Yeah, but its your gimmick, so why don’t you go ahead.
Polaski. This is a goddamned stupid thing to do, but ok. I’m Jason Polaski, I go to college at the university of Connecticut, and I’ve started a bblog.

Jason. Speaking of that, what’s up with the blog anyway? Whose going to read it?
Polaski. That’s what I’m trying to find out. You hear about these guys who get millions of hits every day, and they aren’t even famous or good looking, at least, they weren’t famous before they had a blog. Its just Joe shmow, or Jill Shmill, for that matter, and they decided to post about begonia’s or there yeast infection or politics or books or whatever and suddenly they have this huge following. I wanted to see if starting from absolutely nothing I could achieve something like that, or at least modest success.

Jason. So what’s the blog about.
Polaski. Search me.

Jason. No, seriously.
Polaski. Seriously, I have no idea. The title of it is Pages and Rages, because I read a lot of books and get pissed off about a lot of stuff, and because those two things are the most prevalent things in my intellectual life, I figured it was a natural starting point. But honestly, if I spend more than fifteen minutes thinking about it, I’ll probably end up posting it. Whatever occupies my interest will be blogged about which cuts down on the blog’s coherency, but will keep me amused.

Jason. So what’s the reaction been like so far?
Polaski. Shit. Seriously, I’m about to pull a Phoebe Prince.

Jason. Right. So lets get to the personal stuff. You got any religious views.
Polaski. Yeah, but they aren’t flattering.

Jason. Can you elaborate on that?
Polaski. Its all shit. Its all just a big mythology, doesn’t matter what the religion is.

Jason. So you hate religious people.
Polaski. Not at all, some religious people are nice, some of them are friends of mine. I just view the entire thing… Like model trains. Some people go nuts over model trains. They have entire countries of model trains, schedules, different engines. They go down to the basement and tinker with the things. When they ask me if I want to take a look, I do, but just a look. I’m not going to go look at model trains all the time, because that’s not my thing. I respect there interest, even if I think its a little weird, but its just a part of there life I don’t really care to be involved in. That’s basically how I feel about religion.

Jason. OK, political views.
Polaski. Somewhere between a rightward leaning fiscal conservative and a leftward leaning social democrat. I hate the moral majority, hate the socialists claiming to be democrats. Its complicated. Sort of libertarian, but some libertarians are also crazy. Economically, I’m pretty conservative, I want low taxes, free markets, that kind of thing, but socially, I want really the same thing. The government to allow any action that doesn’t hurt anyone. I’m for legalization of pot, guns, abortion the death penalty and I really hope that smoking indoors is brought back before next winter.

Jason. So sort of libertarian.
Polaski. Yeah, in a lot of ways. The government should stay out of a lot of things. Mairage, for example. Its not the governments business who marries who, or whose fucking whom. It shouldn’t be a concern. I also think the government shouldn’t be fucking about with companies too much. Corporate taxes should be low, and regulations should be made to address a need, not to craft policy. Companies shouldn’t be allowed to hurt people, by poisoning the environment or starting monopolies, but they shouldn’t be gelded just to appease the spirit of Ted Kennedy. But I also think a lot of spending is extremely vital in certain area’s like defense and education, which a lot of libertarians will disagree with. I think the government should be very involved in some things, and really leave other’s alone.

Jason. Got a favorite brand of cigarette?
Polaski. Anything without a filter, or newports. I smoke a pipe, cigars, and hookah. Really, if it burns and has nicotine, I’m down.

Jason. Favorite drink?
Polaski. Beer, either Coors or Guinness, anything cheap on tap. Gin and tonic, good red wine. I hate shots of straight liquor, but always end up pounding them anyway.

Jason. What do you like for music.
Polaski. Mainly shitty rap. I love going to clubs and listening to awful rap music, it sets the perfect atmosphere for what I’m looking for.

Jason. And what’s that?
Polaski. No comment.

Jason. Any other music you’re into besides rap?
Polaski. I’m really digging a lot of classical lately. Bach’s the shit, can’t go wrong with anything by Bach. Vivaldi, similarly is great. Beethoven is also solid. Handle, Montiverty, and lately I’ve been listening to a lot of misorski.

Jason. OK, so part of your blog is about books, what do you read?
Polaski. Honestly, I’ll read anything. Its a matter of what I can get my hands on. I was stuck reading books written before 1950 a year or so ago, so I read them. But if have my choice, a lot of science fiction and fantasy, and a lot of biography and history. Some mystery, some other random stuff that doesn’t necessarily have a category.

Jason. Any final remarks?
Polaski. Read the blog. Tell your friends. Make me rich. I’m on twitter as Jasonpolaski, follow me there for pithy updates

Jason. Thank’s for the interview.
Polaski. Shut up, jackass, this is the beginning of multiple personality disorder. It creeps me out.

review of the Maker’s by Cory Doctorow, wonderful read!

The Maker’s, by Cory Doctorow
Cory Doctorow has written an odd and quirky novel, a novel mainly concerning itself with idea’s. Trying to explain how this is done is complicated, and if I had twenty pages in which to review this book, I’d still end up oversimplifying all the notions he brings up, but just some of the things he examines are micro loans, predicting America’s future, emerging technology, sociological affects of high-speed Internet connections, the affects of cheap materials on the economy, and copyrights affect on creativity.
That might make the novel sound boring, but its not at all boring. Its engrossing, compelling, and extraordinarily readable.
The novel is too multi-faceted to be about one thing, but it focus’s on two inventors and the reporter that follows them around, chronicling what they invent, and how they invent it, the financial backing they get, and thousands of other things.
I haven’t read a novel so quirkily twisted in a long time, and more than anything, as I said above, its a novel of idea’s. The plot is there, and its an interesting plot, but its overshadowed by the sheer wealth of “what if” questions that can be found within the book.
Doctorow’s future America is bleak, but utterly fascinating to read about. Obesity is cured, but unemployment is running rampid, the Internet is almost free, and new technologies are springing up all over the place.
Doctorow has a wonderful ear for language. His writing hops from formal to informal, contemplative to crude, all to serve the needs of the story.
Some of the politics lean a bit leftwards for my taste, but every issue is delt with in an intelligent fashion, so I can’t say that it bothered me too much.
His characters aren’t overshadowed by the idea’s they discuss but enlivened by them. They all felt real to me, and they act in ways true to life. You care what happens to them, and root for them against the odds, even sympathize with the antagonists.
If you’re looking for something new and different, a novel which breaks from most conventions of science fiction, then give the Maker’s a try. Its not an easy read, but I haven’t been so captivated by a novel like this in a long time.
author’s web site http://craphound.com/
yes, its seriously called that.

five out of five stars

Thoughts on Northangar Abbey

   I shall boil six eggs for you. It will be no problem.
   Just read three or four chapters of Northanger Abbey over lunch. Its strange how much social moors inform novels. Things you don’t notice when reading something contemperary will jump out at your grandkids as strange, just as I find it a constant unsettlement to discover that no women in Austen novels work, and that it is, in an Austen Novel, for women to travel wiith men who are not related to them. This disturbs me.
   The chapters I read weren’t particularly good. Three chapters involving Katherine worrying because she blew someone off who she was to take a walk with. What a strange world, where that’s an issue.